Mixture of Experts (MoE) in AI is an ML technique that uses multiple specialized models, called “experts,” to solve complex problems efficiently.
Each “expert” is a neural network (or a simpler model) trained to specialize in a specific part of the data distribution. A separate “gating” network determines which experts to activate for each input. It assigns different weights to different experts dynamically. The gating network then dynamically selects and/or combines the outputs of these experts based on the input data, ensuring that the most relevant models contribute to the final prediction.
In other words, instead of using all parameters for every input, MoE routes data through the most relevant experts, reducing computational costs while maintaining model size. This is kind of like the “division of labor”, allowing each expert to focus on specific tasks for better outcomes.
How does MoE lead to better and more accurate results while keeping computational costs low?
The core components of the MoE architecture include:
These components operate based on:
Loss Balancing & Load Balancing – Since some experts may be more frequently used than others, MoE architectures often include mechanisms to balance workload across experts. Techniques like auxiliary losses and noisy top-k gating ensure that all experts contribute to learning.
By using different experts that each focus on a different subset of the problem, data professionals gain several key advantages:
Here are suggested steps for training Mixture of Experts for LLMs:
Step 1: Training the Expert Networks – Each expert is a separate neural network, typically a feedforward layer or transformer block. Each model is trained separately, in the standard training way.
Step 2: Routing Inputs to Experts – Train the gating network to route inputs to the selected experts. It is recommended to use supervised training, allowing the gating network to learn which expert to assign.
Step 3: Optimizing MoE Models – To control compute costs, MoE models usually activate only 1 or 2 experts per input. This can be enforced using Top-K gating, where the highest-scoring experts receive the input.
Step 4: Load Balancing – A common issue in MoE is expert imbalance, where certain experts get overused. To counter this, a load balancing loss (e.g., auxiliary loss) is added to encourage even distribution of inputs.
MoE combines multiple “expert” models, where each expert specializes in a different part of the data. This approach allows MoE to scale efficiently, both in terms of computation and model capacity. In a testament to the efficiency of this approach, Meta recently released a new herd of Llama4 models, which leverage MoE.
Below are some key applications of the mixture of experts model:
Feature
|
Mixture of Experts |
Traditional Models |
Scalability
|
Highly scalable due to modular design, allowing more experts to be added as needed.
|
Limited scalability; increasing model size leads to significant computational costs.
|
Efficiency
|
Activates only a subset of experts per input, reducing computational overhead.
|
Processes the entire model for every input, making it computationally expensive.
|
Specialization
|
Experts specialize in different tasks or domains, improving application performance.
|
A single model must generalize across tasks, reducing quality.
|
Training Speed
|
Once implemented, training is faster since only a subset of experts is updated per step.
|
Entire model must be trained for updates, leading to slower convergence.
|
Interpretability
|
Easier to analyze which expert handles a given input.
|
Harder to interpret how the model makes decisions.
|
While MoE has shown promise in improving efficiency and scalability, it also presents several challenges:
Aggregation: The outputs of the experts are combined, typically through weighted averaging or concatenation, to produce the final result.